photography

Comprehensive Photo Film Index

film cannister

Here’s one for all my film photography followers.

The Darkroom just opened up a “comprehensive” index of available films. You can check it out here.

While it’s not 100% exhaustive, and I’m sure hardcore film geeks will debate some of the different film stats (except the insane latitude of Kodak Tri-X) it’s still a very nice, handy guide, and I’m sure it will be of value to anyone who is either new or returning to the wonderful world of film photography.

I tend to trust The Darkroom, as I send all my color rolls to them and they do a nice job for a reasonable price.

photography

Kodak Gold 200 Film Discontinued?

IMG_20190923_174843350

I got a hot tip yesterday from the /r/analogcommunity on Reddit┬áthat Kodak Gold 200 film was on a serious discount at Walgreen’s pharmacies across the U.S.A.

Averaging between $4.79-$12 for a 3-pack of 24 exposure rolls, the clearance price varies from decent to “gotta grab it” levels of bargain basement insanity. I spent an hour yesterday afternoon driving to my area Walgreen’s and while some had already sold out, I managed to find five packs. Only one was expired.

Walgreen’s clearance has everyone speculating that Kodak could be discontinuing the Gold 200 line of film stock, perhaps leaving only ColorPlus 200 and Ultramax 400 for user-grade films?

I’ve never shot Gold 200 before. I’ve seen some nice work with it online, but honestly for a 200 ISO film it was simply too expensive compared to the ColorPlus 200 and Fujifilm C200 I was able to snag online. C200 seems to be getting rarer, and if Gold will truly be discontinued then I’m glad I’ll have a little stockpile in my fridge.

My hope is that Kodak is simply discontinuing 3-Packs of it. Inexpensive film is a good gateway to photographers who are either discovering or returning to film photography, and at least where I am it’s near impossible to find Kodak ColorPlus 200 anywhere but online. I hear it’s more of a European product? I’m sure there are business reasons behind it, but I hope they maintain at least one cheapo stock alongside the Portas and Ektars for higher-end use.

If you’re reading this and dig on Gold, go check out your local Walgreens. Kodak Gold 200 apparently produces very rich reds and yellows, so I’m anticipating some nice Autumn foliage shots when I load it up.

photography

Summer Fun on Cape Cod 2019

Here’s a selection of photos from my summer vacation back in August.

These were taken in Cape Cod, Massachusetts in Hyannis and on Mayflower Beach.

I used my Pentax KM along with some FujiFilm C200 and a “new” el-cheapo Vivitar 50:1.8 lens.

As a bonus, you also get “lamp in sky” which is my very first accidental double exposure using film. I had to fix my shutter and this happy accident (as Bob Ross would say) occurred. I think it looks pretty cool, and it’s the kind of thing that can only happy organically on film. I’m also keen on the odd chemical aberration that happened from the pic riding across the Bourne bridge.

Also of note: when your subject is seagulls, Wheat Thins are an effective form of payment to encourage them on the shoot.

photography

How Many Lenses Should You Own?

image of 35mm camera lenses

I recently purchased a Vivitar 50mm 1.8 prime lens (K-Mount) for my Pentax KM. This brings my total # of vintage lenses up to 7, across two camera bodies.

Since each of them is a prime lens (meaning fixed and cannot zoom), I wondered what other film photographers consider the “correct” number of lenses for their kit?

For my Ftb and KM I have a 28mm wide angle, 50mm, and 135mm macro. FD and K-mount, respectively. I also have a 55mm K-mount, but it is very similar to the 50mm. I feel like this gives me a decent range and capability for various projects.

I was lucky to inherit a number of the lenses, and find good deals on others, especially since film photography can get expensive and I’m trying to stick to a firm budget.

What are your preferred lenses? Do you like the sharpness of primes, or the flexibility of zoom lenses so you don’t have to lug around as much in your bag?